Posts Tagged ‘Twitter’

The elephant in the ‘breakfast’ room

Friday, February 3rd, 2012

This week saw the launch of the Government’s first ever national campaign to raise awareness of the signs of bowel cancer. ‘Be Clear on Cancer’ encourages those with persistent symptoms to present promptly to catch the tumour earlier, with an ultimate aim of improving survival rates across the UK.

In spite of the condition being the third most common cancer across the country, to date there’s been clear reluctance to focus the public spotlight on it. Be Clear on Cancer has of course been backed by leading charities, such as Beating Bowel Cancer and Bowel Cancer UK, both of which provide exceptional ongoing support to patients and their families.

The launch of the initiative has received extensive press interest but the way in which it’s been welcomed by the media is somewhat ironic. Despite the whole point of the campaign being to raise awareness of the symptoms of the condition, it seems a proportion of editors have shied away from the nitty gritty ‘below-the-belt’ symptoms and left key campaign messages out of their reporting. We do appreciate it’s not exactly what you want to hear blaring out of the radio during your morning ablutions or digest while eating your bowl of cornflakes. However the media are such a powerful communications vehicle, and in this day and age there must be a more palatable way in which to educate the public via these still important traditional routes so that we can talk more frankly and hinder the number of cases soaring?

There’s a raft of disease areas where Pharma, healthcare professionals and charities can really collaborate with the media and work together on the best means to communicate to the masses/stimulate discussion that suffer the same taboo, and each deserve the appropriate air time!

In the meantime, on behalf of all those supporting #BeClearOnCancer, the initial symptoms of bowel cancer include:

  • blood in your stools
  • a change to your normal bowel habits that persists for more than six weeks
  • abdominal pain and/or unexplained weight loss

Embarrassed? Uncomfortable? You shouldn’t be.

Is engagement the key to charity’s austerity challenge?

Friday, December 2nd, 2011

With the economic downturn, many charities are really feeling the pinch (59% of UK charities are negatively affected according to the Charity Commission’s last report Charities and the Economic Downturn). Of these charities, 62% say that have experienced considerable reductions in contributions, specifically housing, health and education charities.

So are charities needing to become more creative in how they attract donations? Certainly, the recent collaboration between Dulux and UNICEF, which invited people to own a colour, is a brilliant example of a fresh and more importantly engaging approach to fundraising which we mentioned in a recent blog.

In a bid to make it easy for people to donate, we are seeing more and more charities turning to social media sites which can be linked directly to sponsorship platforms such as JustGiving, which help supporters to collect funds and eliminate the hassle of filling out sponsor forms.  In fact, this has helped 13 million people raise over £930 million for more than 12000 charities since 2001. Unsurprisingly, Facebook and Twitter have been most successful in driving these donations – in September 2011 it was reported that over 27% of all JustGiving’s on line donations were driven directly through Facebook and the highest value donations were received through Twitter.

So the question is in tough times are charities the first to suffer or is creativity and engagement the key to success? Well, last month’s high profile ‘Children in Need’ campaign seems to refute this having raised a record-breaking £26 million.  The question is was it the content that drove the rise in donations or was it the integration of donations via social media and texting alongside the traditional that broadened the scope and made it all so much easier to give.  ‘Meaningful’, multi-channel, or a combination of both, is that the way to improve charities fortunes?

 

Mistakes revealed: Online media… a journalists’ friend or foe?

Friday, October 14th, 2011

It’s no secret that the demand to gain access to information at the touch of a button (or should I say the touch of an ipad!) has seen the evolution of online media. With news and material communicated around the world in a matter of seconds, is it time for journalists to realise the world is watching?

With an estimated 2 billion internet users worldwide, an error of judgement can be broadcast globally in a matter of seconds. No one will easily forget the Daily Mail’s reporting on the ‘guilty’ – or not ‘not guilty’ – Amanda Knox, that in its rush to break the story first, broadcasted an inaccurate report to the world. Unfortunately this kind of action just adds further collateral to the current Leveson inquiry (but that’s a whole other debate altogether).

Just this week, we’ve seen another ‘oopsy’ moment when freelance foreign correspondent Rob Crilly’s irate tweets to the Telegraph editor over his modified article, were automatically posted on the Telegraph website. Rob’s actions remind us that the World Wide Web is aptly named – our online actions are available for the world to see in a flash. Despite both these errors being swiftly removed from the public domain they have stimulated widespread reporting and show that online mediums allow the ever watching world to see mistakes which print media never could.

Despite all this, the likes of Twitter provide a resource many journalists cannot now live without and figures from the fourth annual Digital Journalism Study found nearly half (47 per cent) use Twitter as a source. It has revolutionised the way they work and instantaneously broadcast information. It has in fact proven to be mutually beneficial for both journalists and the audience, so like many friendships, they may have fallings out once in a while but they will almost always kiss and make up and come back for more.

What happens online stays online? How newspapers follow the social media agenda more than ever before

Friday, May 13th, 2011

This press man has just realised that all his journalist buddies have moved on from pencil scrawls on notepads to Twitter feeds on iPads. While his buddies all secretly miss the matching suit and hat combo, they have moved on and our guy has been left behind.

Indeed, 70% of journalists now use social networks to assist reporting compared to 41% the year before (no statistic on hats was available at the time of writing however). This sea change, cited in Appature’s tidy little ‘Twitter in Healthcare’ infogram, is not too surprising, but besides journalists using Twitter to keep up to date with the big breaking news stories, what else does social media offer journalists and where is it all heading?

Super-injunctions are a good place to start – they show just how more ‘free’ online information is when compared to professional media organisations. The Times boldly attacked injunctions by printing the story they intended to write with blacked out text where the information regarding the celebrity involved would be.

None of this has stopped online reporting, largely through Twitter and other social media channels, outing those who have paid for their privacy through these expensive court orders. If you want to find out whodunit just have a look online @InjunctionSuper.

This is a very literal example of how the relationship between traditional media and online has reversed. Rather than big media organisations setting the news agenda on which online discourse focuses, they now report largely on a story that breaks online.

Even in the most old fashioned of editorial conferences and newsrooms, there is a growing understanding that these online interactions have changed. And the social networks they are increasingly exploring and experimenting with are keen to help.

The official Twitter Media blog highlights how TV stations are increasingly using Twitter to poll sentiment about a news story while they broadcast, for example by comparing the number of people adding #GoRoyals or #NoRoyals to their tweets. Newspapers are also printing some of their favourite tweets, such as my beloved local South London Press producing a column with the most amusing and thought provoking messages from local people (although they’re not quite as good as some of their headlines…)

This is all well and good but there still seems to be some significant reluctance by some organisations to get on board the social media rollercoaster as the infogram below shows, from Will Sturgeon’s Media Blog. While Sky News and the BBC have policies in place for their journalists to use Twitter on an individual basis, most newspapers are doing little to speak directly with their audiences in this way. So does this mean they are even more likely to be following the agenda set by online outlets and channels?

At the end of the day, it is individual journalists that are taking the lead with online journalism and this is where anyone working in media relations should focus their efforts. Big organisations are not often well equipped to implement major institutional and cultural change – and this includes media organisations’ social media practices. The most immediate thing happening now is that journalists are using Twitter off their own back to get good stories in the paper. So if you want to get a newspaper’s attention about something, getting to know what conversations these guys are having is not a bad place to start.

Are news outlets competing with Twitter to break stories?

Monday, May 9th, 2011

In case you haven’t heard, Osama Bin Laden is dead. But who was the first to break it? Was it Sky News, the BBC or one of News Corporation’s many media channels? Nope, it was in fact Sohaib Athar (or known in the virtual social world as @ReallyVirtual) who first tweeted about a helicopter hovering over the compound at 1am.

 

In fact, according to a poll by social media news blog Mashable of over 20,000 people, around 30% of participants heard about Bin Laden’s death via Twitter, including myself. In addition to this, Osama Bin Laden’s death was one of the most tweeted events in history, sparking a record 12.4 million tweets per hour. These are absolutely astounding figures for a resource that wasn’t available to us a decade ago. It begs the question whether social media is fast becoming the primary source for breaking news and where this leaves other traditional media.  Is there still some value in reading about the latest news stories in the following morning’s papers?

Although Twitter provides a forum for real-time updates and gives people the opportunity to analyse and post personal opinions on subject matters there is of course a huge difference between stories you can read from a well thought-out article compared with a micro-blog. For starters, one mustn’t forget that journalists need to verify the authenticity of their stories (well, most of the time anyway) and images before they can publish their news. As much as I believe in the rise of citizen journalism and Twitter as a news source, I don’t fail to recognise the work and thorough research that goes into a five page spread about the latest breaking story. Secondly, not only are the stories more credible but you also can’t always believe what you read on Twitter as shown by the recent viral hoax which claimed that Jackie Chan was dead, when in fact he was in very good health!

And the same applies to breaking health news. Back in 2009, during the swine flu outbreak, ‘swine flu’ and ‘Mexico’ were the most tweeted topics during the first few days of the outbreak. Twitter was also used by the US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention to transmit the latest official advice and direct concerned citizens to helpful information. This also helped address the immense amount of incorrect information being posted on the social service at the time.

Essentially, I would say there isn’t a competition between the social versus traditional route of hearing about the latest news.  Twitter might be a faster, more viral medium for breaking worldwide news such as Bin Laden’s death but traditional media provides thorough insights and credible content, which is better researched and backed-up than 140 characters can provide. There’s not much of a competition in my eyes, they’re just different!

Vodafone: When online PR goes wrong #mademesmile

Tuesday, December 14th, 2010

If a brand is at the heart of a reputational issue, you’d be forgiven for expecting the issue to come up if you ask people about that brand. But what if you went ahead anyway, thinking that the positive nature of the campaign would off-set any damaging commentary about that ugly little issue you’re avoiding? Well, that’s when things go wrong as Vodafone’s failed #mademesmile Twitter campaign shows…
(more…)

Launch of ‘Path’: The ‘anti-social network’

Wednesday, November 17th, 2010

The announcements of Facebook email and the Beatles on iTunes are not the only big social media news stories of the last few days. Since the launch of Path – dubbed the ‘anti-social network’ may have passed you by, here is a bit of a recap…
(more…)

How Twitter stopped malaria deaths

Wednesday, September 29th, 2010

There is a tendency to reach for the next big thing when it comes to digital and online health communications. But sometimes the best communications campaigns use well known or traditional tools. Dare we say that Twitter may soon be a ‘traditional’ tool, at least in online communications? Regardless, it can and does have a big impact. So how did Twitter stop malaria deaths?
(more…)

How Twitter ‘fast follow’ can keep you updated at a conference

Wednesday, August 11th, 2010

While this is not necessarily an amazing new development, the new ‘fast follow’ on Twitter does have some very practical, simple and crucially easy uses – one of which is particularly relevant for healthcare communications. At big conferences or events, following the official conference Twitter feed (such as @ASCO) will keep you up to date on what is being presented as it happens and what the most promoted sessions are by the organiser. There might also be particular feeds from specific pharma companies presenting new study data that you’d want to keep an eye on. But what if you don’t have a reliable internet connection all the time? Or if you are pretty unfamiliar with Twitter and don’t have an account yourself? ‘Fast follow’ offers a solution …
(more…)

Tylenol recall well-handled?

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

Johnson & Johnson’s McNeil Consumer Healthcare division last week recalled numerous products including OTC children’s medicines such as Tylenol and Zyrtec syrup. This is not good news considering the company had to issue an even bigger recall only a few months ago. However, on the face of it the company seems to have done a far better job of managing the issue this time not least by using online platforms and well written, clear communications. So what does this tell us about how issues can be managed using new media?

(more…)